More on co-tenancy clauses

I alluded to co-tenancy clauses in leases a few months ago in the context of Sears, but I am going to bring it up again after reading this story raising yet more about the topic.

For you newbies and novices, here's the scoop. A tenant with leverage-- be they big boxes, national retailers with pull or other credit tenants -- will ask for (and, in this market, get) a clause in its lease giving it the option to terminate the lease if a certain tenant (or tenants) in the shopping center terminates its lease or goes dark (i.e., closes while paying rent). Example: if Circuit City goes bankrupt in a shopping center with other tenants that have a co-tenancy clause for CC, those tenants now have the right to walk form their leases. All of a sudden your leased-up center is half-empty. Some tenants also negotiate a right to walk if retail sales do not reach a certain level.

Anyway, you get the picture: a vicious cycle, or at least a spiral. That is why, as the story say, you could see why some landlords may have additional strain or worse. I do not want to get into my own strategies for dealing with these issues, but they are certainly something a careful lawyer considers on day one of the letter of intent.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lehman, AIG, and now Merrill? Think there are some busy lawyers?

First Barclay's walks from Lehman -- yet another suitor gone, and liquidationsville of some sort is being predicted. That is unless another angel comes to the table. AIG is looking to restructure itself, too -- they have rejected a private equity infusion and are apparently turning to the Fed . And now we are all reading that B of A and Merrill are looking to merge as well. If Lehman really goes bye-bye, I will miss it. They did a good job on every deal in which I was involved. But the market is what it is, and some say this is the way Bear should have ended too. In this case, though, Lehman's world's end would be with a bang, not a whimper. People are scared . As Matt Heaton put it over on ActiveRain, it is getting surreal . And will this panic the market tomorrow? I guess we'll see what Asia and Europe do tonight. I may have to cancel some meetings for tomorrow or at least keep an eye on the TV or radio. The dirt angle of this is huge, too, in my opinion...
Read more

GGP and SPEs - bankruptcy remote, bankruptcy proof?

Now that I have a few minutes, I want to comment on a great story in Friday's Journal about the General Growth Properties bankruptcy. When GGP filed its Chapter 11, it also dragged 166 individual malls with it. How so? Each mall is owned by a special purpose entity, demanded by its lenders to try to prevent what actually happened. And this could have major ramifications throughout the real estate world. Why? Because (a) lenders thought the structure of the deals would prevent this from happening; (b) GGP wants to take the cash flow from the deals into general operating funds for the company rather than into paying these otherwise-performing loans -- in short, use the good malls to prop up the dogs; and (c) get some leverage in the bankruptcy. For those of you saying, "Huh?" here's an explanation: In past years, to get the malls' mortgages, General Growth had set up 166 "special purpose entities" whose sole purpose was to borrow money. SPEs are attr...
Read more

Is it me, or is this obvious?

Holland & Knight has some really good real estate lawyers. They do. And they give good advice to their clients. Here's some they gave recently: Banks are willing to work with commercial real estate developers on projects before trouble arises, and bankruptcy should not be part of the equation for either side. That’s the opinion of lawyers with Holland & Knight LLP, which discussed options for a down market with both groups during breakfast Thursday at the firm’s local headquarters. Don't get me wrong: I absolutely agree with this advice. I just find it utterly unfathomable that any troubled developer would file an 11 or a 7 without trying to negotiate a workout with the bank. And I'll bet a nickel that this is what the lawyers said or at least implied. The story, at least to me, just came off as overstating the obvious, and I'm confident that was not the complete thrust of what was going on at these meetings. Maybe I'm just not getting it -- it'...
Read more